Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Overview

What is Amazon SQS?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Provides the Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS), a managed message queue service which supports the safe decoupling and distribution of different components in a cloud infrastructure and cloud applications.

Read more
Recent Reviews

All Q's answered for SQS

7 out of 10
January 31, 2022
Our Application was integrated with third-party app, to fetch updated data from third-party app without keeping users to wait, we used SQS …
Continue reading

My opinion about SQS !

8 out of 10
August 03, 2021
Incentivized
SQS is one of AWS services we are using for many different projects.
It helps us to dissociate the components of our architectures and to …
Continue reading
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

All Data Transfer In

$0.00

Cloud
per GB

Standard Queue

$0.00000004

Cloud
per request

FIFO Queue

$0.00000005

Cloud
per request

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Amazon SQS?

Amazon SQS Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(29)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-2 of 2)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) to manage even queues for several of our internal applications. We have an application that receives and processes jobs for ad placement on different advertising platforms. These jobs are relatively critical, and reliable processing is a must. Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) provides a serverless queue to handle these requests for us as well as a target that can be tracked to keep a job status as well as capture any errors executing the job.
  • It provides an always-available serverless queue for workflows or mission-critical processes.
  • Is extremely low cost and overall costs to our environments have been negligible.
  • Scheduling options could be a bit more robust since deferred deliveries can be held for a maximum of 15 minutes currently.
  • Maximum message size limitations are not a huge hassle, but it would be nice to have the option to include larger messages with detailed log messages. This can be worked around but requires using another service such as DynamoDB to persist large messages and reference them from Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS).
While we use AmazonSimple Queue Service (SQS) in our serverless applications, it would be a great option to handle queue management for any internet-connect application. It provides the most benefit in situations where your application or service must maintain mission-critical queue of messages or jobs. If you're already using other AWS services you will find the greatest benefit.
  • Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) has given us the ability to manage many different processes without breaking our serverless application models.
  • Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) has allowed us to add a robust degree of reliable job processing without any measurable added cost.
While we haven't had very many issues with Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) that required us to contact AWS support, the response has always been timely and helpful.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
SQS service is under use at the company level, to handle the different application-level requirements. We mostly use it to decouple different level of modules so that we can provide an efficient solution to the end user.
  • Provides very good support for asynchronous processes.
  • Hosted in the cloud, which supports HIPPA complaints.
  • Options for a FIFO and Standard queue, so anyone can choose on the base of their requirements.
  • Has an add-on functionality of configurable parameters, like Delivery Delay, Default Visibility Timeout, Message Retention Period, Receive Message Wait Time, etc.
  • Almost all of the functionality has been covered by SQS, but they could improve the throughput time.
  • Also, they could provide built-in Cloud Watch, so that we can easily configure it without any external efforts.
We needed an application where we could communicate between asynchronous modules, and we needed a reliable solution where we could upload data under the HIPPA compliance, and Amazon SQS is the best fit.
  • Under the AWS Echo system, it provides great operating power to the application.
  • The cost is much less for messages, and it also supports a multi-user option.
  • Not for us, but for a larger organization, low throughput might become an issue for a standard queue type.
The reason for the choice is due to maintenance needs and HIPPA compliance, as well as the great options under the AWS ecosystem, with very useful configurable parameters.
Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2), Amazon API Gateway, Neo4j, Amazon Relational Database Service
Return to navigation